[FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great
Views expressed here are not necessarily the views & opinions of ActivistChat.com. Comments are unmoderated. Abusive remarks may be deleted. ActivistChat.com retains the rights to all content/IP info in in this forum and may re-post content elsewhere.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ahmadinejad is no Shah and Wears no Turban

Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> News Briefs & Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:59 pm    Post subject: Ahmadinejad is no Shah and Wears no Turban Reply with quote

Ahmadinejad is no Shah and Wears no Turban

December 28, 2005
Iran va Jahan
Cyrus Kadivar


Nobody doubts the true essence of the tyranny that has overshadowed Iranís proud culture since 1979 with its medieval bigotry, violence, militancy and disregard for human rights. In a recent article entitled ďA shah with a turbanĒ written by Thomas L. Friedman and published over Christmas in the International Herald Tribune the authorís poor choice of words undermined what was a damning condemnation of the current president of the Islamic republic of Iran. I totally agree with him that Iran is no ďdemocracyĒ and that the entire system is riddled with imperfections and that the greatest losers are the youth of Iran who are deprived of achieving their true potential in such a suffocating culture.

But for heavenís sake to compare Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to a shah (king) with a turban not only reveals Mr Friedmanís blindspot but also his apparent lack of understanding of Iranís historical and religious makeup. Firstly, the new president is, despite his messianic tendencies and conversations with the Hidden Imam, a non-cleric. Even if he were a cleric, no true Islamic theologian would allow him to wear religious garb let alone carry the turban of a holy man. Secondly, comparisons to the Shah, is an unfair attempt to downplay the key role played by Iranian monarchs in the past 25 centuries. Whilst lacking in democratic virtues, many shahs characterized their rule by establishing their authority and the stability required for the flourishing of art, religion, education and material and cultural advancement.

But perhaps, Mr Friedman was drawing comparisons with the last Shah of Iran whose 37 year rule has so easily been written-off as has his positive accomplishments. This too, is misleading. True, at worst, the proud Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi may be criticised for his ambitious dreams for a modern Iran and falling from power, but he will also be remembered for promoting a civil society and a culture of tolerance practiced by his ancestors.

During his reign, school children were taught the story of the liberation of the Jewish people in Babylonia by King Cyrus in 538 B.C. They learned about how Esther, the Jewish concubine of King Xerxes, managed to secure royal protection for the followers of her faith and organized the establishment of Jewish colonies throughout the Persian Empire. The Jews may have suffered under the Qajar shahs but neither of the Pahlavis (Reza Shah nor his son) can be accused of mistreating them. There were no pogroms and state-sponsored acts of anti-Semitism nor the burnings of synagogues or the banning of Jews from public life. Even during WWII (shortly before the Allied Invasion of Iran on the false pretext that Reza Shah was pro-German) an Iranian diplomat in Paris was ordered to issue passports to French Jews escaping Vichy persecution.After the Holocaust many Jews were given homes and citizenship in Iran.

Like all minorities in Iran, the Jews in Pahlavi Iran were allowed representatives in the Majlis (Lotfollah Hay served in parliament from 1967-1975 and was a leading industrialist) and even served in the armed forces and state ministries. In fact, their contribution to the arts, wine-making, science, law, medicine, education and music industry in Iran is a well-documented fact in Estherís Children published in 2002 by The Center For Iranian Jewish Oral History and edited by Houman Sarshar. Another Jewish Iranian, Manuchehr Bibian established the Appollon Music Company Ė the countryís most advanced music recording and production studio of its time Ė and with it revolutionized Iranís music recording industry. Jews such as Iraj Lalehzari were members of Iranís Royal Academy under Empress Farahís direction. There were Jewish schools, active social and cultural organizations, and some thirty places of worship in Tehran alone. Hebrew classes were taught openly and Israelis were invited to lecture and speak at seminars.

Before his fall, the Shah maintained cordial relations with Tel Aviv whilst calling for a settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Yes, under the last Shah, Iranian Jews enjoyed all the social liberties granted to fellow Muslims, Christians, Zoroastrians and Bahais. The Khomeini revolution was a disaster for Iranís Jews. The Ayatollah accused them of ďdistorting Islam, mistranslating the Koran, and taking over the Iranian economyĒ. In smaller cities and towns, Jews were bullied by their Muslim neighbours and anti-Jewish leaflets were distributed in the bazaars to boycott their businesses.

In the months following the Shahís dethronement, the turban-headed mullahs executed a wealthy Jewish industrialist by the name of Habib Elghanian. In 1981 the revolutionary guards (in which Ahmadinejad once served) shot Simon Farzami, a prominent and brilliant Iranian journalist and writer. The reason? He was a Jew!

As a result of the Islamic revolution, half of Iranís 40,000 Jews fled or emigrated to Israel and the West. Many have remained loyal to the old country (some still hang portraits of Iranís deposed royal family and the imperial flag in their homes) despite adjusting to life in new lands. Their exodus deprived Iran of centuries of wealth and talent, but more significantly a cultural heritage that had been entwined with the glory that was once Persia.

Although under President Khatami a certain degree of tolerance was established in regards to Iranís remaining Jewish community, all this seems to be changing. Alas, in Iran 2005, Khomeinism is being regurgitated and everything good is hidden and whispered in the dark. To be a Jew in Iran must be a frightful experience these days. Ahmadinejadís crude remarks about Israel and the Holocaust is in line with the late Ayatollahís trampling of universal values and international law. Taking advantage of the astonishing leniency of the world community toward their criminal deeds, the leaders of the Islamic republic have watched their evil spread. I shudder to think what Iran would become if Ahmadinejad wore a crown or a turban. Placed on an unworthy head it would mean the end of history and God.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> News Briefs & Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group