[FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great
Views expressed here are not necessarily the views & opinions of ActivistChat.com. Comments are unmoderated. Abusive remarks may be deleted. ActivistChat.com retains the rights to all content/IP info in in this forum and may re-post content elsewhere.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Sword and sandal epics inflaming persion national pride?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> General Discussion & Announcements
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
reza



Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 466
Location: England

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 7:28 am    Post subject: Sword and sandal epics inflaming persion national pride? Reply with quote

With films such as thermopylae, alexander and most importantly cyrus the great. It is only a matter of time before the iranian national pride is invoked and restored, just as Firdawsi achieved with the shanameh. Razz
_________________
"When on the battlefield if you have the sole intention of breaking into the enemy lines, you will manifest martial valour. Furthermore if you are slain in battle you should be resolved to having your corpse facing the enemy" - Yamamoto tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Equality



Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 97
Location: Richmond VA (USA)

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

there is a movie about Cyrus the Great? when is it coming?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reza



Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 466
Location: England

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They should be filming over the summer if everythings in order
_________________
"When on the battlefield if you have the sole intention of breaking into the enemy lines, you will manifest martial valour. Furthermore if you are slain in battle you should be resolved to having your corpse facing the enemy" - Yamamoto tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spenta



Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Posts: 1829

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

unfortunately in Pakistan Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reza



Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 466
Location: England

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah i don't think the mullahs are going to help with this film in any way at all. Rolling Eyes
_________________
"When on the battlefield if you have the sole intention of breaking into the enemy lines, you will manifest martial valour. Furthermore if you are slain in battle you should be resolved to having your corpse facing the enemy" - Yamamoto tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trainspotter9



Joined: 09 May 2004
Posts: 99
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sun May 09, 2004 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh I want to see Cyrus the Great!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reza



Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 466
Location: England

PostPosted: Sun May 09, 2004 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hell yeah! it's just too bad there are no persian actors to play him, Sean connery is being courted to play him though, he is pretty good
_________________
"When on the battlefield if you have the sole intention of breaking into the enemy lines, you will manifest martial valour. Furthermore if you are slain in battle you should be resolved to having your corpse facing the enemy" - Yamamoto tsunetomo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blank



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 1672

PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They should have had Timothy Dalton palying Cyrus The Great.......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trainspotter9



Joined: 09 May 2004
Posts: 99
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2004 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the actor who play Captain Jean Luc Picard, Patrick Stewart, could be a good Cyrus.

I think Timothy Dalton would work too.

What I really want though, is an Iranian actor to play Kouroush. I want the entire cast to be Iranians.

The Zoroastrian Persians had an ethnic religion. Their religion forbade them from marry outside of their race. Despite being a tolerant and worldly religion, Zoroastriasm was also highly ethnic. In fact, Judaism became an ethnic religion only after it was influenced by Zoroastriasm. Before, Jews got wives outside of their race, but after the introduction of Zoroastrian ideas, Jews were obligated to marry only within their tribe.


Last edited by trainspotter9 on Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spenta



Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Posts: 1829

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2004 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is simply not true. Many ancient Persian Kings married outside their ethnic groups, they even married Jewish princesses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guest






PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 5:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Many ancient Persians, especially kings, weren't strict about their religion.
Back to top
trainspotter9



Joined: 09 May 2004
Posts: 99
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Many ancient Persians, especially kings, weren't strict about their religion. Zoroastriasm, when followed strictly, demands of its people to marry within the Persian Zoroastrian race.

Last edited by trainspotter9 on Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:05 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pantea



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Posts: 201

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

trainspotter9 wrote:
^ Zoroastriasm, when followed strictly, demands of its people to marry within the Persian Zoroastrian race.

If you look at the Parsees of India, you will see that they are one of the most consanguineous populations in the world. Their Zoroastrian faith has forbidden them from marrying outside of their group. They are also, reportedly, one of the most intelligent groups in India.


In the old days and according to the gathas it wasn't forbidden for zarthoshtis to marry other "races".
please take a look at the following article from: http://www.zarathushtra.com/z/article/marriage.htm

In these verses, while Zarathushtra outlines Pouru-Chista’s lineage and family, there is no mention of the groom. While this is somewhat unusual, it imparts the implication that there is no prescriptive directive as to whom Pouru-Chista should have chosen (other than the spiritual attributes outlined above.) Presumably, the groom could have been younger or older, poorer or richer, of a stately background or from the peasantry or any other class or cast or race or religion, so long as the two of them chose each other with the counsel of the Good Mind, and with the goal of surpassing each other in righteousness.

the thing is since the Parsis left Iran they've been very afraid of becoming extinct.. so they added some elements to their believe and tried to preserve the Zartoshti ways.

one other example is the preaching: Parsis and iranian zartoshti differ on this matter too.
According to some Mobeds in Iran there's nothing wrong with converting people as long as they themself (thus without force) want to follow the teachings of Asho Zartosht, whereas most Parsi Mobeds denounce this idea saying the Zartoshti believe is reserved only to the people who already are Zartoshti and none other.

I hope I made clear some of the differences between the original faith and it's present versions.

with regards
Pantea
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trainspotter9



Joined: 09 May 2004
Posts: 99
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2004 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pantea,

alot of what is said about Zoroastrianism is said by modern Zoroastrians who like to think of their religion as the ultimate universal, all-accepting, all-tolerant, pure religion; the original liberalism. This is simply not the truth of the matter.

This debate about the origins of the Book of Tobit, a biblical book, illustrates the beliefs of the ancient Persians, especially the religious Magi caste:

http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/view.cgi?number=T8826

(1) The book describes the varying fortunes of Jews in exile so completely and with such keen sympathy as to suggest that the writer was himself one of them.

(2) The affectionate language in which he refers to Jerusalem and its religious associations (Tobit 1:4) is such as a member of the Diaspora would use.

(3) The author nowhere reveals a close personal knowledge of Palestine. That Tobit, the ostensible author (1:1), should be set forth as a native of Galilee (1:1 f) is due to the art of the writer.

Assuming that the book was written in a foreign land, opinions differ as to which. The evidence seems to favor either Persia or Egypt. In favor of Persia is the Persian background of the book. Asmodeus (Tobit 3:8,17) is the Pets Aesma daeva. The duty of burying the dead is suggested to the Jewish writer by the Persian (Zoroastrian) habit of exposing dead bodies on the "Tower of Silence" to be eaten by birds. Consanguineous marriages are forbidden in the Pentateuch (see Leviticus 18:6); but they are favored by Tobit 1:9; 3:15; 4:12; 7:4. The latter seems to show that Tobias and Sarah whom he married were first cousins. Marriages between relatives were common among the Iranians and were defended by the magicians as a religious duty.


Furthermore, if you read what the ancient Greek historian, Herodotus, says about the ancient Persians, it is clear that they believed in their own race's superiority:

http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/herodotus-persians.html

Quote:
Of nations, they honor most their nearest neighbors, whom they esteem next to themselves; those who live beyond these they honor in the second degree; and so with the remainder, the further they are removed, the less the esteem in which they hold them. The reason is that they look upon themselves as very greatly superior in all respects to the rest of mankind, regarding others as approaching to excellence in proportion as they dwell nearer to them; whence it comes to pass that those who are the farthest off must be the most degraded of mankind.


Last edited by trainspotter9 on Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pantea



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Posts: 201

PostPosted: Sat May 22, 2004 2:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear trainspotter,

from what I can make up out of your message, you're convinced most people in the old days prevered to marry someone from their own race or even family. Very true indeed some people in Iran and other countries still marry within their own family.

However, this has nothing to do with religion, this has been simply a matter of tradition (wich still exists in some countries) and cultural heritage.
As I pointed out, there's no evidence of that in Avesta. The part I copied in my mail is the only place in the Gathas where Zartosht himself adresses the marriage.
Any restrictions put on zarathushtrians in case of marriage is there for not based on the religon but on the habbits that persians had.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> General Discussion & Announcements All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group