[FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great
Views expressed here are not necessarily the views & opinions of ActivistChat.com. Comments are unmoderated. Abusive remarks may be deleted. ActivistChat.com retains the rights to all content/IP info in in this forum and may re-post content elsewhere.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Iran's Taazi Regme Role In The Latest Arab Israeli Conflict
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> News Briefs & Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ViaHHakimi



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:56 pm    Post subject: Hezbollah is our enemy, too Reply with quote

Hezbollah is our enemy, too

By Jeff Jacoby


According to a pair of Gallup polls released last week, 83 percent of Americans say Israel is justified in taking military action against Hezbollah, while 76 percent disapprove of Hezbollah's attacks on Israel. Yet when asked which side in the conflict the United States should take, 65 percent answer: neither side. Indeed, 3 in 4 Americans say they are concerned that the US military will be drawn into the fighting, or that it will increase the likelihood of terrorism against the United States.

Gallup's numbers suggest two things. First, that most Americans, sizing up the warfare in northern Israel and southern Lebanon, recognize that Hezbollah is the aggressor and that Israel is fighting in self-defense. And second, that most Americans believe this fight has nothing to do with the United States!?
Welcome to Sept. 10.

For years Osama bin Laden had preached that it was "the duty of Muslims to confront, fight, and kill" Americans. His adherents had responded by blowing up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and slamming a boat laden with explosives into the USS Cole. Yet most Americans paid no attention to Al Qaeda and its threats — until 3,000 people lost their lives on Sept. 11, 2001.

Has nothing been learned from that experience?

Hezbollah's barbaric assault on Israel — kidnapping and murdering soldiers who weren't engaged in hostilities, firing waves of missiles into cities and towns, packing rockets with ball bearings meant to maximize suffering by shredding human flesh — is part and parcel of the radical Islamist jihad against the free world. Nothing to do with the United States? It has everything to do with the United States. Hezbollah hates Americans at least as implacably as Al Qaeda does, and rarely misses an opportunity to say so.


"We consider [America] to be an enemy because it wants to humiliate our governments, our regimes, and our peoples," railed Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, at an enormous rally in February 2005. (Video of Nasrallah's speech, which was broadcast on Hezbollah's Al-Manar TV, has been posted on the internet by MEMRI, the Middle East Media Research Institute.) "It is the greatest plunderer of our treasures, our oil, and our resources. . . . Our motto, which we are not afraid to repeat year after year, is: 'Death to America!' "


And from tens of thousands of Hezbollah supporters came the answering cry: "Death to America! Death to America! Death to America! Death to America!"

These are anything but empty threats. Prior to 9/11, Hezbollah was responsible for more American casualties than any other terrorist organization in the world. Among its victims was Army officer William F. Buckley, the CIA station chief in Beirut who was abducted by Hezbollah in March 1984 and who died after 15 months in captivity of torture and illness.

And the young Navy diver Robert Stethem, singled out during the 1985 Hezbollah hijacking of TWA Flight 847 and brutally beaten before being shot to death.

And William Higgins, a colonel in the Marine Corps and commander of the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, who was seized by Hezbollah in February 1988, tortured, and eventually hanged. (As Michelle Malkin perceptively noted last week, the tape of Higgins, bound and gagged and swinging from a rope, was one of the first publicly disseminated jihadi snuff films.)

And the 241 US servicemen murdered by Hezbollah on Oct. 23, 1983, when a suicide bomber drove a truck rigged with 12,000 pounds of TNT into their barracks at the Beirut airport.

And the 19 US servicemen killed in the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia.

For more than two decades, Hezbollah's Shi'ite fanatics, backed by Iran and sheltered by Syria, have made it their business to murder, maim, hijack, and kidnap Americans with the same irrational hostility they harbor for Israel. Yet when Tony Snow, the Bush administration's gifted spokesman, was asked on July 19 whether the president believes "that this is as much the United States' war as it is Israel's war," he answered, "No," and then tried to change the subject. A moment later the question returned: "I don't think you really answered the part about why is this not our war?"

Snow's incredible reply: "Why would it be our war? I mean, it's not on our territory. This is a war in which the United States — it's not even a war. What you have are hostilities, at this point, between Israel and Hezbollah. I would not characterize it as a war."

9/11, it was said time and time again, "changed everything." No longer would Americans walk around with eyes wide shut, oblivious to the threat from the Islamofascists. Not our war? Listen again to the Hezbollah hordes: "Death to America! Death to America!"

They're serious about it — deadly serious. Why aren't we?

==================

That is why the State Department is rightly called “FOGGY BOTOM”?!

H.H.


Last edited by ViaHHakimi on Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ViaHHakimi



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:01 pm    Post subject: This is where our money goes!? Reply with quote

Dears,

This is where our money goes!?

These are the Iranian armaments captured by Israel Army in Lebanon.
Just have a good look.
The Armor Piercing Precision guns that Austria sold us are among the rifles in the hand of an Israeli soldier!?
His Excellency Koffi Anann needs more proof?

H.H.


Source URL:

http://www.hnn.co.il/index.php?module=albums;task=view;id=967






















Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ViaHHakimi



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:36 pm    Post subject: One war Reply with quote

One war

By Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

We cannot afford to pretend that there is an appropriate way for the United States to fight Islamofascist totalitarians and the terror they wield against us, then insist that our allies must negotiate with and try to appease such groups when they are in the Islamofascists' cross-hairs

On September 11, 2001, a freedom-loving nation was attacked by a terrorist organization operating from the territory of a sovereign state with the acquiescence, if not the active complicity, of the latter's government. The United States retaliated with what can only be called a "disproportionate response."

America launched air and ground assaults on Afghanistan, aimed at destroying not only the al Qaeda safe havens but toppling the Taliban regime. We damaged or destroyed critical Afghan infrastructure so as to deny its use to the enemy. Civilian casualties occurred, as did refugee flows. At one point, the UN declared the resulting dislocation a humanitarian crisis.

Once the campaign to eliminate al Qaeda was launched, there was no consideration given to negotiating with the terrorists or the government that afforded them protection. The United States would not have contemplated UN-mandated ceasefire, let alone the insertion of an international peacekeeping force under a Chapter 7 mandate from the Security Council — whose purpose, inevitably, would have been to protect the terrorists from our military, not the other way around.

And most especially, it would have been inconceivable that the U.S. could accede to one of its enemy's central demands — for example, the removal of all American forces from the Mideast — as part of a negotiated ceasefire brokered by the UN and approved by the Taliban at the direction of al Qaeda.

It is therefore stunning, not to say depressing, to see how the Bush Administration's early, strong support for Israel's response to the murderous attacks on its territory by the terrorist group, Hezbollah, has morphed in recent days.

First, Israel was told it must not undermine the Lebanese government, even though the latter had not only acquiesced to what amounts to a Hezbollah-controlled state-within-a-state in southern Lebanon. The government in Beirut actually has two Hezbollah ministers in its cabinet — a role al Qaeda never enjoyed in Taliban Afghanistan. This injunction had the practical effect of limiting Israeli efforts to press officials in Beirut to disassociate themselves from the terrorists in their midst.

Then, the U.S. embraced the idea that Israel must reward the government that has allowed Hezbollah to occupy and operate against the Jewish State from the part of south Lebanon the Israelis foolishly and unilaterally vacated in 2000. Where we destroyed the regime that afforded safe haven to our foes, Israel has been told it must make a further territorial concession to its counterpart by surrendering to Lebanon a small area known as Shebaa Farms that Israel has occupied since 1967.

Never mind that Shebaa Farms was not Lebanese territory to begin with; Israel conquered it from Syria in the Six-Day War. The character of this area was confirmed by none other than the United Nations. It certified in May 2000 that Israel had withdrawn from all Lebanese territory, that the Farms are not and have never been part of Lebanon and that their final status would ultimately have to be settled in negotiations between Israel and Syria.

Now, however, Israel is being told it must satisfy what amounts to a demand of Hezbollah — a manufactured pretext for the Iranian-backed terrorist organization to continue its war against Israel, even after the Israelis had abandoned the security zone they had wisely maintained in Lebanon for eighteen years (along with the erstwhile Lebanese allies who lived there).

It is bad enough that Hezbollah will thus be rewarded for its terrorist attacks on Israel. The implications of this concession will prove much worse, however, to the extent the message is conveyed by it that Israel is not entitled to — and cannot expect to enjoy — inviolable, internationally recognized borders. To paraphrase an old saw: What belongs to the Arabs is the Arabs'; what belongs to Israel is extortable.

Even more problematic is the prospect that the United Nations will shortly mandate — with U.S. backing and Israel's acquiescence — the insertion into southern Lebanon of an armed international force. Its purpose, ostensibly, will be to enforce a ceasefire pursuant to a new Chapter 7 Security Council resolution. If its job is to "keep" the peace, not make it, such a force will by definition require Hezbollah's assent to enter. The peacekeepers will understand, moreover, that they will be allowed to remain there in safety only if they do not interfere with the terrorists' rebuilding and resupply activities in south Lebanon.

The make-up of this force may compound the problem. Under discussion are troop contributions from places like Turkey, Indonesia and France — nations that are not likely to prove unfriendly to Hezbollah and that are, to varying degrees, hostile to Israel. In short, this will be just another anti-Israel UN mission, providing protection to the Free World's terrorist foes and doing little if anything to keep them from readying new attacks on freedom-loving peoples.

For the United States, the current phase of this War for the Free World began on September 11, 2001. For others, like Israel it has been going on for decades and represents an unmistakably existential threat. We cannot afford to pretend that there is an appropriate way for the United States to fight Islamofascist totalitarians and the terror they wield against us, then insist that our allies must negotiate with and try to appease such groups when they are in the Islamofascists' cross-hairs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:10 pm    Post subject: Hezbollah executes 18 Lebanese Christians & Drews for ex Reply with quote

Hezbollah executes 18 Lebanese Christians & Drews for exposing Hezbollah hideouts
http://www.iranpressnews.com/source/014966.htm

The Islamic regime-run news agency ILNA’s reported: "18 Israeli spies, from the port city of SOOR, located in southern Lebanon were executed. The German News Agency reported that those executed by a firing squad were accused [by Hezbollah militia] of espionage for Israel. According to the report in the German press, the foreign nationals who had were boarding ships organized for their evacuation from Lebanon, were present at the time of the executions. Dr. Boris Bok, a Munich physician told the German media that he witnessed a number of the Lebanese resistance fighters [who opposed Hezbollah] be charged with aiding the Israelis in air strikes and were therefore brought to the firing squads. The German physician and other German nationals who were transferred from Lebanon to Cyprus clearly stated that they saw everything as it happened; the witnesses said that the people who were executed had also divulged location of the houses of the Hezbollah terrorists to the Israeli air force.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:27 pm    Post subject: Hezbollah and Pro Hezbollah IslamoFascist Are Responsible Fo Reply with quote

Hezbollah and Pro Hezbollah IslamoFascist In Iran Are Responsible For This War and Destruction ...

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/world/0608/popup.beirut/frameset.exclude.html?eref=yahoo

Before and after satellite images of Dahieh, Lebanon, a southern suburb of Beirut and home to Hezbollah's headquarters, show how it has dramatically deteriorated during warfare between Israel and Hezbollah. The image taken July 12, when fighting began, shows intact buildings and roads. The photo taken July 22 shows gaping holes where buildings once stood and roads in ruin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AmirN



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still think that Hezbollah and the rest of the Taazis are to blame for these tragedies. Nevertheless, in light of more recent events, I cannot help but also feel a degree of contempt for Israel as well.

The victims upon victims of Israeli air-strikes continue to mount. The vast majority of those victims are civilians, including numerous women and children. There is something inherently wrong with a strategy when the “collateral damage” and “incidental deaths” far outnumber the “intended deaths.”

Hezbollah is the instigator, and is the primary culprit. But Israel must also be held to account for what’s going on as well.

As most of you know, I am not usually a critic of Israel, and I would rather have Israel as an ally in the fight against the Taazis. But we must not always be so set in our ideals as to ignore changing circumstances and new information. In this instance, criticism must be rendered when it is deserved.
_________________
I am Dariush the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries containing all kinds of men, King in this great earth far and wide, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenian, a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage

Naqshe Rostam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blank



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 1672

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I disagree, It is Hezbollah that cowardly hides behind the civilians and enjoys this destruction. They know the whole world would blame Isreal, so the savage Hezbollah keeps hiding their rockets and ammunations, where the civilians live. Isreal has gone out of her way to let the people know to leave the area, by dropping leaflets. If Isreal does not uproot this vicious terrorist group, the whole world will be in trouble, and the ragheads will be the winner.

Liberty can only be achieved by spilling the blood of tyrants.........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anusiya



Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 237

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Isreal has gone out of her way to let the people know to leave the area, by dropping leaflets.


Unfortunately, most of the areas a war zone. Like in Qana, if the civilians leave the place theyll get shot, if they stay, they get bombed.


Quote:
The victims upon victims of Israeli air-strikes continue to mount. The vast majority of those victims are civilians, including numerous women and children. There is something inherently wrong with a strategy when the “collateral damage” and “incidental deaths” far outnumber the “intended deaths.”


There probably is a more efficient way of doing things.

An actual land invasion, although it would seem more hostile, may allow pinpointing of actual Hesbollah people instead of bombing and hoping that you've got them. It would probably also allow Israel to get rid of rockets without killing (as many) civilians. Also a day's worth of ceasefire may be enough to evacuate people from the border areas and Beirut, and then afterwards, Israel can go full blast on Hesbollah.

Like with the pictures of Dahieh - there were probably around a few thousand civilians there, and maybe 10 or 11 Hesbollah people (I mean, even though theyre the headquarters, theyre not going to be concentrated all in one place to make israels job easier, are they?).

I hope Israel / US / etc will be good enough to loan some money to help the future Hesbollah-free lebanon rebuild itself WITHOUT the absurd interest rates that World Bank usually charges ...
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blank



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 1672

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From: "Ramin Etebar, MD" Mobile Alert
To: "Ramin Etebar, MD" Subject: Quote of the year
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 03:40:03 -0700

In a recent interview, General Norman Schwarzkopf was asked if he thought there was room for forgiveness toward Hezbollah. The General said, “I believe that forgiving Hezbollah is God's function.
The Israeli's job is to arrange the meeting."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AmirN



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Hezbollah is despicable is not in dispute.
That Hezbollah is the main culprit and the instigator is not in dispute.
That the world would be a better place without Hezbollah is not in dispute.
That Hezbollah act as cowards, hiding in Lebanese residential areas is not in dispute.

What’s in dispute is Israel’s culpability, independent of Hezbollah’s. Is Israel accountable for the hundreds of innocent civilian deaths in Lebanon? Is Israel’s current war policy justified? Is it acceptable for Israel to bombard a site, possibly destroying a Hezbollah target at the risk of also killing a dozen women and children?

That Israel has a right to defend itself against scum like Hezbollah is not in dispute. The question is, with what strategy, and with what acceptable level of collateral damage should Israel pursue that goal.

As with everything else in life, a good assessment of a tactical situation must involve a risk to benefit ratio assessment. Now, how that risk to benefit ratio is defined gives insight into the priority and morality of a person, institution, or nation.

If Israel views the current targets it has selected as an acceptable risk to benefit ratio, then I seriously question that nation’s morality. Furthermore, if it views risking hundreds of Lebanese civilians’ lives preferable to risking its own soldiers’ safety by choosing to carry out this campaign via the air rather than committing ground troops which is more likely to cause innocent deaths, then that also tells me something as to that nation’s views on acceptable risk. Namely, risking foreign civilians rather than domestic soldiers.

Whatever the case, Israel needs to seriously reconsider its strategy, because the current one aint working. It has yet to make a crippling blow against Hezbollah, and has only managed to kill and maim hundreds if not thousands of innocent Lebanese. This will be Israel’s undoing by twofold. First, it will alienate the world to its cause, as the world will not continue to watch this type of civilian massacre in silence. Second, it will help recruit many otherwise peaceful Lebanese or other Arabs to Hezbollah’s side, as it already has begun doing.

Israel needs a significantly different strategy, and it needs it fast.
_________________
I am Dariush the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries containing all kinds of men, King in this great earth far and wide, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenian, a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage

Naqshe Rostam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blank



Joined: 26 Feb 2004
Posts: 1672

PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AmirN wrote:

Whatever the case, Israel needs to seriously reconsider its strategy, because the current one aint working. It has yet to make a crippling blow against Hezbollah, and has only managed to kill and maim hundreds if not thousands of innocent Lebanese. This will be Israel’s undoing by twofold. First, it will alienate the world to its cause, as the world will not continue to watch this type of civilian massacre in silence. Second, it will help recruit many otherwise peaceful Lebanese or other Arabs to Hezbollah’s side, as it already has begun doing.
Israel needs a significantly different strategy, and it needs it fast.


Well, since everyone is criticizing Isreal, I wonder if you can come up with a new strategy, because you cannot resolve a dispute by being critical, at the same time, you need to offer a solution..... What kind of a solution will stop Hezbollah from killing Americans & Jews. What kind of solution will end Hezbollah's occupation of Lebanon. What kind of solution will stop Hezbollah Antarinejad & gang, from killing Iranians and others , and end to their occupation of Iran......... If you cannot come up with a solution then you don't have the right to criticize.

Liberty can be achieved only by spilling the blood of tyrants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AmirN



Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 297

PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First, it is a very wanting defense to say that an idea or policy cannot and should not be criticized unless another one is offered in its place. The same people that are capable of understanding the defects of that idea or policy may not necessarily be the best people that are capable of offering an alternative. That may be done by another. To recognize something as flawed does not make the flaw any less if the observer does not necessarily know how to fix that flaw.

If I get into my car, and notice that smoke comes out of the engine, followed by clanking noises and the shutdown of the car, I believe I have every right to criticize the working order and functionality of that vehicle. I am not a mechanic, so I am not able to pinpoint the exact defect or how to fix it. But I damned well know that the car is messed up. I may tow in the obviously flawed car to a mechanic’s shop and ask him to fix it. To say that since I don’t know how to offer a solution to the car’s malfunction I have no right to criticize that vehicle, and I should get inside and keep restarting it to make it go is ridiculous.

Second, when it comes to war and the misery that it brings, the best alternative is peace. Granted, it takes both parties to achieve peace. However, I have not seen a serious effort on behalf of peace by either the Arabs or the Jews. In that, they are both culpable, although I recognize that Hezbollah and the other Taazis are far more culpable.

Third, I believe that I already presented an alternative to Israel’s current war strategy. That is, even though they are at war, they must use a different priority for target selection than they are currently doing. If there is risk of civilian deaths from striking a certain Hezbollah target, they ought to reconsider striking that target. So how must they get to the targets that are hidden in residential areas? Certainly, by putting boots on that ground rather than calling air-strikes will minimize civilian deaths. But doing so would mean greater risk and casualties for Israel’s army. Is that a risk that Israel is willing to take? Should that be a risk that Israel ought to take?

Furthermore, a ceasefire is required so that an International Force can come in and set up a buffer zone circumventing Hezbollah’s ability to strike Israel. Is there any serious effort by Israel right now to work towards that ceasefire? Or does Israel simply have the destruction of Hezbollah as its only priority? I would love to see Hezbollah destroyed. But at what cost? Am I willing to see the sacrifice of hundreds if not thousands of innocent men, women, and children so that a number of Hezbollah fighters and rocket launchers get licked? I certainly am not.

Fourth, the world needs to wake up and smell the true aroma of the Hezbollah poison. A fix is needed in the current conflict, and fast. But the world must once and for all realize that it can never truly get rid of Hezbollah until the current Islamic Taazi regime in Iran is not eliminated. As long as the current Taazis in Tehran hold power, Hezbollah will continue to terrorize the world. New members will always appear that are willing to die for their Taazi God. And the flow of Iranian oil money will always keep such lunatics armed. Hezbollah is the tail of the lizard. It will continue to re-grow so long as the lizard itself lives. The lizard, of course, is the IR.

The long term goal of the world ought to be to kill this lizard once and for all. Not just talk about it in public, but feed the lizard in private as they have been doing for all these years. The world must finally seek a genuine determination to kill that nasty lizard.

Fifth, though I agree that liberty can only be achieved by spilling the blood of the tyrants, in the current situation I have yet to see the blood of a tyrant spilled. The vast majority of the blood I have seen spilled is the blood of the innocents, mixed in with a little bit of non-innocent Hezbollah fighters’ blood. Even the relatively small amount of non-innocent blood of Hezbollah fighters does not qualify as the blood of tyrants. It is only the blood of a few mislead and ignorant fools; mere foot soldiers of the tyrants. The tyrants themselves are all sitting quite pretty…whether in Lebanon or in Iran.
_________________
I am Dariush the Great King, King of Kings, King of countries containing all kinds of men, King in this great earth far and wide, son of Hystaspes, an Achaemenian, a Persian, son of a Persian, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage

Naqshe Rostam
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anusiya



Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 237

PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Latest Stats (from wikipedia)

Hezbollah:
Killed: 80 (Hesbollah claims), 8 (Amal Militia), 800 (Israel claims)

Israel:
Civilians:
Killed: 35
Injured: 1293
Displaced: 300,000
Soldiers:
Killed: 45
Wounded: 154
Captured: 2

Lebanon:
Civilians:
Killed: 967
Injured: 3220
Displaced: 1000000
Soldiers:
Killed: 28
Wounded: 73

Quote:
Certainly, by putting boots on that ground rather than calling air-strikes will minimize civilian deaths.

Also, after Hesbollah have been removed, Israel should contribute freely towards rebuilding Lebanon and perhaps giving a little land to Hesbollah-free Lebanon as a sort of "sorry I screwed you infrastructure" gesture
(this will also have the effect of maybe removing support for Hesbollah)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cyrizian



Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 226
Location: Houston TX

PostPosted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

Also, after Hesbollah have been removed, Israel should contribute freely towards rebuilding Lebanon and perhaps giving a little land to Hesbollah-free Lebanon as a sort of "sorry I screwed you infrastructure" gesture
(this will also have the effect of maybe removing support for Hesbollah)


I'd say Lebanon needs to apoligize for supporting hezbollah in the first place. Something along the lines of "Sorry we murdered so many Jews and provoked you to war." And Nasrallah needs to be tried for crimes against humanity along with his staff. ...And while we're at it, we need to capture and try the Syrian supporters and that damn Antarinejad!

Cyrizian
_________________
You wrote that the world doesn't need a savior...but everyday I hear people crying for one. -Superman
To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him. -Earnest Renan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Oppenheimer



Joined: 03 Mar 2005
Posts: 1166
Location: SantaFe, New Mexico

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saudi sheikh issues fatwa against Hizbullah
UPI

http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060724-041632-4671r

July 24, 2006

RIYADH -- Saudi Arabian Wahhabi Sheikh Abdullah Bin Jabreen has declared it illegal for Muslims to join, support, or pray for militant group Hizbullah.

Jabreen declared a fatwa against the group for its actions against Israel, revealing a divide among Sunni Muslims over the issue of the Israel-Hizbullah conflict, the New York Sun reported on Friday.

The Wahhabi sects have largely come out against Hizbullah's actions in the region but some Sunni fundamentalist groups, including the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, have pledged support for the Shia militant group. The brotherhood was planning a rally on Friday to support the militants at Cairo's Al Azhar mosque.

Sheikh Hamid Al Ali, in Kuwait, issued a statement on July 13, the day after two Israeli soldiers were abducted by Hizbullah, condemning the organization's actions and describing the conflict as a result of Iran's imperialistic ambitions in Israel.

The governments of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia have also condemned the actions of Hizbullah.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> News Briefs & Discussion All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group